Enjoy this article?
Most Museums Journal content is only available to members. Join the MA to get full access to the latest thinking and trends from across the sector, case studies and best practice advice.
Greenwashing – the process of presenting deceptive or false information about how “green” a company’s products or services are – can mislead museums and the public, and undermine confidence in efforts to tackle climate change
Watch out for carbon offsetting, where a company tries to balance their own emissions by finding other ways to remove an equivalent amount of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
Experts such as Greenpeace warn this can be a sign that they are trying to detract attention from the environmental damage of their actual business operations.
Do due diligence on a supplier’s sustainability report. The Zero Carbon Analytics research group has produced a guide to deciphering the jargon – including whether any Scope 3 emissions are excluded.
It is also vital to keep an eye out for selective disclosure. According to the UN, this might look like communicating the sustainability of a product, while ignoring other impacts. An example is clothing made from recycled materials in a high-emitting factory that pollutes the air and nearby waterways.
The UN also highlights the use of buzzwords such as “eco-friendly” or “green”, which can be misinterpreted as there are no standard definitions. Likewise, vague language or unsubstantiated environmental claims are often a red flag that products are not all they seem to be.
If you look after procurement, you have a duty to look beyond a company’s environmental claims and do you own research. Looking deeper into company ownership is a good starting point, as an increasingly widespread greenwashing tactic is for large firms to acquire smaller brands with environmental credentials.
Most Museums Journal content is only available to members. Join the MA to get full access to the latest thinking and trends from across the sector, case studies and best practice advice.